Saturday 19 January 2013

Content


Court File Number: FM/27/12

IN THE COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF NEW BRUNSWICK

TRIAL DIVISION

JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FREDERICTON

BETWEEN:     
                                           ANDRE MURRAY                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                 Applicant,

                                                                               -and-

                               ROYAL BANK OF CANADA,
                               501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate,
                               THE HONOURABLE MARIE-CLAUDE BLAIS Q.C.,
                               THE HONOURABLE ROBERT DOUGLAS NICHOLSON                                                                                                            
                                                                                                  Respondents,


Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, the Province of New Brunswick and Canada. The Applicant has been a victim of multiple section 7 and subsection 15(1) Charter violations as described within the Notice of Application.  The Applicant has been caused undue and unnecessary emotional and physical distress and suffering as a result of the aforementioned Charter violations; The Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick is an appropriate Court under subsection 24(1) of the Charter to hear, determine and remedy the above-noted Charter violations.



Pleading- Notice of Application Form 16D
May 31, 2012, Notice of Application Form 16D,  FM/27/12. Applicant Andre Murray's Application Regarding a Charter Challenge.


Affidavit in Support of Notice of Application Form 16D
May 31, 2012, Affidavit in support of Notice of Application Form 16D,  FM/27/12. Applicant Andre Murray's Application Regarding a Charter Challenge.

Briefs to be used on Hearing of Charter Application:
Applicant's Brief
December 14, 2012,  Applicant's Brief to be used for Charter Challenge Application. FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.

Respondent's Brief
December 12, 2012, Legal Brief filed by Gaetan Migneault for the Attorney General for New Brunswick, in response to Application for Charter Challenge. FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.





Motions – in the Order they are filed 

(1) Motion 1, Dated July 3, 2012, filed by 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate:
Solicitor for  501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate Hugh J.Cameron.
Motion/Affidavit Preparation documents

Motion
July 3, 2012, Motion regarding allegations of a vexatious litigant, et al., Order, filed by Hugh J. Cameron, solicitor for 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate. FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.

Affidavits in support
July 3, 2012, Affidavit of Richard McGuigan Part 1 of 2. FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.

 July 3, 2012, Affidavit of Richard McGuigan Part 2 of 2. FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.

December 13, 2012, Affidavit of M.W. regarding Justice Done Dirt Cheap Blog. This Affidavit is in violating the New Brunswick Rules of Court 4.01(2) and 4.05(1)(a). FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.

Affidavit Response to Motion
December 14, 2012, Affidavit of Andre Murray, in response to Motion filed by 501376, a body corporate, FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.

Misc – research notes and further notes

Record on Motion

Brief / Submission
Submission
Brief
December 14, 2012, Legal Brief filed by Hugh Cameron on behalf of 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, in support of their Motion alleging a Vexatious Litigant. FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.


December 14, 2012, FM/27/12 Legal Brief Dated in response to Motion filed by 501376, a body corporate. FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.




(2) Motion 2, Dated July 5, 2012filed by ROYAL BANK OF CANADA:
Solicitor for Royal Bank of Canada: George H. LeBlanc
            Motion/Affidavit documents

Motion
July 5, 2012, Motion regarding allegations of a vexatious litigant, et al., FM/27/12, Filed by George LeBlanc, Solicitor for Royal Bank of Canada.

Affidavits in support
July 5, 2012, Affidavit of Ghislain Bernard, Number One - supporting Motion Filed by Royal Bank of Canada FM/27/12.

July 5, 2012, Affidavit of Ghislain Bernard Number two -part 1 - supporting Motion Filed by Royal Bank of Canada. FM/27/12 Charter Challange - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.

July 5, 2012, Affidavit of Ghislain Bernard Number two -part 2 - supporting Motion Filed by Royal Bank of Canada. FM/27/12 Charter Challange - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.

Affidavit Response
December 14, 2012, Affidavit, in response to Motion filed by Royal Bank of Canada - RBC. FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.

Misc – research notes and further notes
Record on Motion

Brief / Submission
Submissions- None

Brief
Respondent's Brief:
December 11, 2012, Legal Brief filed by George H. LeBlanc on behalf of Royal Bank of Canada - RBC,  in support of their Motion alleging a vexatious litigant. FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.

Applicant's Brief:
December 14, 2012, Legal Brief, in response to Motion filed by Royal Bank of Canada - RBC. Filed by Andre Murray, FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.





(3) Motion 3 Dated December 14, 2012; Filed by Self Represented Applicant Andre Murray:
Motion/Affidavit Preparation documents
Motion
December 14, 2012, Motion for leave and Abridgement of time, filed by Applicant, so that the scheduled December 17, 2012 hearing could proceed. FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.


Affidavit in support:
December 14, 2012, Affidavit of Andre Murray supporting Motion for leave and Abridgement of time, FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.
Misc – research notes and further notes

Record on Motion

Brief / Submission

Brief
December 14, 2012, Legal Brief, filed by Applicant Andre Murray, supporting Motion for leave and Abridgement of time. FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.





Miscellaneous documents:

July 6, 2012, Affidavit of Glenn Cudmore. FM/27/12 Charter Challange - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.

December 12, 2012 Cover Letter to Clerk of Court Craig Carleton from Attorney General of New Brunswick's Office. FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.

December 12, 2012 Affidavit of Keith Ball. FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.

December 12, 2012 Affidavit of Keith Ball, Exhibit A and C.  FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.

December 12, 2012, Affidavit Leanne Murray. FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.

December 13, 2012, Letter to Clerk of Court regarding possibility of adjournment of December 17, 2012 scheduled hearing. FM/27/12 Charter Challenge - Charter Application –  Andre Murray v. ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, 501376 N.B. Ltd., a body corporate, Province of New Brunswick, Canada.

November 23, 2012 Affidavit of Neil Rodgers, agent provocateur FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE Informant of 15 Fisher Avenue, Fredericton, New Brunswick.




Decisions/Orders




Leave to Appeal

Unsatisfied with this Draconian Court order of Madame Justice Judy Clendening Applicant Andre Murray filed a Motion for Leave to Appeal (for 62A) to the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick:

http://coanbfn16412caandremurrayvrbc.blogspot.ca/






STATEMENT OF FACTS

1.             As of April 2012, the Applicant AndrĂ© Murray (hereinafter “the Applicant”) has been a residential tenant at the same location, paying monthly rent uninterrupted to the same Landlord’s bank account for seven consecutive years.  The Applicant has never been served a valid Notice of Termination of Tenancy or a Form 8 Notice of Transfer by the Landlord, Betty Rose Danielski (hereinafter “the Landlord”) in accordance with New Brunswick’s Residential Tenancies Act, S.N.B. 1975, Cap. R-10.2, subsection 13(8).

2.             On March 28, 2005, the Applicant signed a four-year Form 6 Residential Lease (Standard Form of Lease) with the Landlord for the duplex property located at 29 and 31 Marshall Street, Fredericton, New Brunswick (hereinafter “Property”).

3.             On September 1, 2005, the Applicant signed a year-to-year Form 6 Residential Lease (Standard Form of Lease) with the Landlord for the Property.

4.             On October 21, 2011 at 2:00 p.m., at the Court of Queens Bench Moncton Trial Division, the Honourable Mr. Justice Zoel R. Dionne gave his oral decision which was and/or is applicable to five motions, moreover, a decision which was to encompass all five motions of seven outstanding motions before the Honourable Mr. Justice Zoel R. Dionne.

5.             The Applicant is a residential tenant and leaseholder of the Property.
     
6.             The Respondent Royal Bank of Canada (hereinafter “Royal Bank”), is a chartered bank having its head office in Montreal, Quebec, and having a branch office located in Fredericton, New Brunswick.

7.             The Respondent, 501376 N.B. Ltd., is a body corporate with its head office on the Doak Road, Fredericton, New Brunswick.
8.             The Respondent, The Honourable Marie-Claude Blais, Q.C., is Minister of Justice and Attorney General for the Province of New Brunswick, with the office located at 670 King Street, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 1G1.
9.             The Respondent, The Honourable Robert Douglas Nicholson, is Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, with the office located at 284 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0H8.
10.         The Applicant issued a copy of the neither vexatious nor frivolous Notice of Application pursuant to subclause 22(3)(a)(i) of the Judicature Act, R.S.N.B. 1973, Cap. J-2, to each of the Attorney General for New Brunswick and the Attorney General for Canada, confirming that a constitutional issue has been raised in this case, namely whether or not the Residential Tenancies Act, supra, or that the Property Act, R.S.N.B. 1973, Cap. P-19, subsection 47(1) infringes upon, and is invalidated by, sections 7, 8 and 9 and subsection 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (hereinafter “Charter”).

11.         The Applicant has been a victim of multiple section 7 and subsection 15(1) Charter violations as described within the Notice of Application.  The Applicant has been caused undue and unnecessary emotional and physical distress and suffering as a result of the aforementioned Charter violations;

12.         This is an appropriate Court under subsection 24(1) of the Charter to hear, determine and remedy the above-noted Charter violations.



ISSUES

QUESTIONS FOR THE COURT TO ANSWER

  1. Does the Residential Tenancy Act, violate the section 7 and or subsection 15(1) of the Charter?

  1. Does the Property Act, supra, violate the section 7 and/or subsection 15(1) of the Charter?


The Grounds

1.             The Applicant brings this application pursuant to subsection 24(1) of the Charter which provides for remedy to the individual whose “rights” pursuant to the Charter have been infringed.  A “court of competent jurisdiction” is a tribunal that has jurisdiction over the person and the subject matter, and, in addition has the authority to make the order sought.  In this case the Court of Queens Bench, being a Superior Court, is such a court that has jurisdiction over the person and the subject matter, so that pursuant to subsection 24(1) of the Charter, the Court of Queens Bench Trial Division has the authority to make the order sought herein.  The Charter matters before the Court are: 

a)    That subsection 47(1) of the Property Act, supra, is impugned legislation because it is worded in such a manner as to be manipulated and/or misinterpreted, to consequentially violate and or circumvent the Charter protected rights of residential tenants;

b)    The Residential Tenancies Act, supra, is unequivocally NOTWITHSTANDING all other acts and, despite this, mortgagees are continuing  to blatantly benefit from special and unequal benefit of the law as in this case; the Honourable Mr. Justice Zoel R. Dionne has established a precedent which, if allowed to stand, will continue to enable mortgagees to violate residential tenants’ rights and for this reason, the legislation must be considered impugned and in need of Charter compliance to be brought into alignment with Charter values;

c)     The Residential Tenancies Act, supra, properly protects tenants and the Charter protected rights of residential tenants; however, as in this application the Royal Bank, and 501376 N. B. Ltd.; the Court of Queens Bench Trial Division and certain Law Society Members have all participated to circumvent the Residential Tenancies Act, supra, in violation of the Charter rights of the Applicant;